Futuristics
& Law Enforcement--The Millennium Conference
July 10 -
14, 2000
FBI
Academy
Quantico,
Virginia
Introduction
For
the first time since 1991, a futures conference was held at the FBI Academy in
Quantico, Virginia. Entitled
"Futuristics & Law Enforcement--The Millennium Conference," this
event was attended by distinguished individuals with diverse backgrounds, including
policing, academia, and literature. The
purpose of the conference was to take the first steps toward producing a vision
for policing in the 21st century in five areas: The Future of Technology and Its Effect on
Law Enforcement; The Future of Leadership
and Management in Policing Agencies;
Future Crime/Future Law; The
Future of Policing Practices and Philosophies; and The Changing Face of
America--Demographics and Policing.
The attendees examined possible futures for law enforcement and formulated
strategies that police leaders will be able to employ to create the “preferred
future” for their agencies and communities.
In
order to accomplish the very ambitious goals of the conference, a modified
Nominal Group/Delphi surveying process was employed. Group members were asked to formulate possible future trends in
their areas of interest. Once these
trends were formulated, group members anonymously voted on the likelihood
that a particular trend would occur by a certain year as well as the impact
that the trend would have on policing by that year. Multiple rounds of voting
were conducted to allow participants to modify their opinions based upon the
input of their peers. The results of
the conference appear below.
Attendees
Attendance
at "Futuristics & Law Enforcement--The Millennium Conference" was
by invitation only. The desire of the
conference organizers was to obtain a broad cross-section of opinion relating
to the future of policing. As such,
participants of diverse backgrounds, both from inside and outside of law
enforcement, were included. All had
distinguished themselves in their chosen professions. As well, each had demonstrated a capacity to think creatively
which all but guaranteed lively, thorough, and insightful discussions on all
issues. The attendees included:
Plenary
Speakers:
Mr.
Dennis Bushnell Future Strategic Issues
National
Aeronautics and
Space
Administration
Mr.
Greg Bear Future
Crime
Science
Fiction Author
Dr.
Gary Sykes Ethics
in the 21st Century
Southwestern
Law Enforcement
Institute
Chief
Gordon Bass Management
in the
Jacksonville
Sheriff’s Office 21st Century
Ms.
Tammany Mulder Demographics in the
Bureau
of the Census Information Age
Mr.
Joel Garreau Networks
and Hierarchies
Washington
Post
The
Edge City Group
Televised
Panel Discussions
“Technology,
Training, and the 21st Century Officer”
Host: Ms.
Penelope Parrish
Law
Enforcement Communications Unit, FBI
Moderator: Dr. Bernard Levin
Blue
Ridge Community College
Waynesboro,
Virginia, Police Department
Panelists: Dr. Michael Buerger
Northeastern
University
Captain
Thomas Cowper
New
York State Police
Dr.
Michael Birzer
Washburn
University
Producer: Ms. Diana Morgan
Technical
Services Unit, FBI
“Privatization
and Policing in the 21st Century”
Host: Ms.
Penelope Parrish
Law
Enforcement Communications Unit, FBI
Panelists: Mr. Cliff Maurer
Carter-Wallace,
Inc.
International
Association of Chiefs of Police
Supervisory
Special Agent John Michael Bellus
Federal
Bureau of Investigation
Captain
Al Youngs
Lakewood,
Colorado, Police Department
Producer: Ms. Diana Morgan
Technical
Services Unit, FBI
Group
Members (With Breakout Presentations As Noted)
Group
1: The Future of Technology and
Its Effect on Policing
Dr.
John Jarvis: Facilitator
Behavioral
Science Unit, FBI
Ms.
Ashley Backman: Recorder
Yale
University
Mr.
Greg Bear
Science
Fiction Author
Mr.
Marc Caplan
National
Institute of Justice
Capt.
Thomas Cowper: Multi-Agency/Multi-Jurisdictional
New
York State Police Communication
Systems”
Lt.
Charles "Sid" Heal The
Magic Bullet: The Ultimate
Los
Angeles County Non-Lethal
Weapon"
Sheriff's
Department
Special
Agent Edward Lewis
United
States Secret Service
Ms.
Ronnie Paynter
Law
Enforcement Technology
Dr.
Kathryn Scarborough
Eastern
Kentucky University
Group
2: The Future of Leadership and
Management in Policing Agencies
Mr.
Arthur Westveer: Facilitator
Behavioral
Science Unit, FBI
Chief
Gordon Bass
Jacksonville,
Florida, Sheriff's Office
Dr.
Michael Birzer The
Pedagogy of Police
Washburn
University Training
Mr.
Trent DePersia Technologies for Law
National
Institute of Justice Enforcement
Applications
Sergeant
Peggy Price Johnson
Duluth,
Minnesota, Police Department
Supervisory
Special Agent Robert E. Lee
Federal
Bureau of Investigation
Deputy
Chief Dennis McKnight
Bear
County, Texas,
Sheriff's
Department
Mr.
Laszlo Toth The
Hungarian National Police
Hungarian
National Police in
the 21st Century
Mr.
Kenneth Whitman
California
Commission on Peace Officer
Standards
and Training
Group
3: Future Crime/Future Law
Captain
Gerald Konkler: Facilitator
Tulsa,
Oklahoma, Police Department
Ms.
Rachel DeVelder: Recorder
Federal
Bureau of Investigation
Dr.
Don DeNevi
San
Francisco State University
Supervisory
Special Agent Daphne Hearn Organized Crime in the
Federal
Bureau of Investigation 21st Century
Mr.
Eric Jefferis
National
Institute of Justice
Professor
Brian Levin Recent
Supreme Court
California
State University, San Bernardino Decisions in Criminal
Law
and Their
Implications
Ms.
Sandra "Sunny" Schwartz RSVP (Resolve to Stop
San
Francisco Sheriff's Department the
Violence Project)-- Violence
Prevention
Special
Agent Darrell Skaggs
Drug
Enforcement Administration
Mr.
Thomas Sunderland
John
Jay College of Criminal Justice
Group
4: The Future of Policing
Practices and Philosophies
Dr.
Bernard "Bud" Levin: Facilitator
Blue
Ridge Community College/
Waynesboro,
Virginia, Police Department
Ms.
Ronnie Bobbitt: Recorder
Federal
Bureau of Investigation
Ms.
Jeri Boisvert
Minnesota
Department of Public Safety
Dr.
Michael Buerger Boardrooms,
Bedrooms
Northeastern
University and
Back Alleys
Dr.
Michael Campion
Police
Psychologist
Deputy
Chief Ron Glensor
Reno,
Nevada, Police Department
Inspector
Gareth Morgan Community Policing in
West
Midlands, United Kingdom, Police the United Kingdom
Mr.
Greg Saville
University
of New Haven
Group
5: The Changing Face of
America--Demographics and Policing
Major
Tyree Blocker: Facilitator
Pennsylvania
State Police
Ms.
Heather Notter: Recorder
Federal
Bureau of Investigation
Chief
Michael Berkow Policing a Divided Society
South
Pasadena, California,
Police
Department
Special
Agent Juliann Brunzell
Minnesota
Bureau of Criminal
Apprehension/International
Association
of Women Police
Mr.
Gerard Cleveland Youth and Police: Breaking the
Toronto
Public Schools Barriers
Dr.
James Conser Privacy
Rights and Public
Ohio
Peace Officer Training Commission Safety
in a Digital World
Dr.
John MacDonald
University
of South Carolina
Dr.
Allen Sapp The
Changing Family and
Central
Missouri State University Individualism
Statistical
Analysts
Ms.
Shinah Kim
University
of California, San Diego
Ms.
Marianna Politzer
Fordham
University School of Law
Ms.
Edith Rickett
Howard
University
Conference
Coordinators
Ms.
Anna Grymes
Behavioral
Science Unit, FBI
Ms.
Cynthia Laskiewicz
Behavioral
Science Unit, FBI
Supervisory
Special Agent Carl J. Jensen, III
Behavioral
Science Unit, FBI
The
coordinators also wish to acknowledge and thank the many other employees of the
Federal Bureau of Investigation who made this conference possible.
Results
Prior
to the conference, it was recognized that attempting to galvanize opinion on
expected trends and recommended strategies would likely require more than the
four days set aside. To that end, prior
to their arrival in Quantico, attendees were asked to submit a list of possible
trends. From the time of their arrival
on Monday until their departure on Friday, participants engaged in group
discussions and individual, anonymous voting to estimate the likelihood of occurrence
and expected impact on policing for each trend. As well, each group formulated strategies that it thought
policing agencies should consider in order to achieve the best possible future
for the organization and community. In
the spirit of the Delphi surveying process, trends and strategies were voted
upon multiple times. The ratings listed
below represent the average of individual group members’ votes of the likelihood
that a trend will occur by a specified date as well as its expected impact
on policing. Each likelihood rating is
expressed as a percentage[1]
(e.g., “there is a 56% chance that trend “x” will occur by year “y”) while the
impact rating follows the following scale: No impact = 0; Little impact = 1; Moderate
impact = 2; Significant impact = 3; Great impact = 4. In addition, some groups arranged strategies in order of
importance; that is, those strategies believed to be the most important were
listed first. Where this occurred, it
will be noted. To attain the strategy
rankings, each group member voted individually and anonymously. The listings, therefore, represent the
average of individual group members’ votes.
The
very nature of futures studies dictates that there is often little finality in
a “final” product. In order to remain
vibrant, creative, and worthwhile, forecasts are constantly reexamined and
refined. To that end, it is hoped that
the results of the conference will be viewed as the beginning rather than the
end of the journey. The conference
participants and coordinators will feel most gratified if their opinions spark
discussion and debate within policing and provide leaders with possible paths
forward.
The
below listed trends and strategies were formulated solely by participants and
do not necessarily represent the opinions of the Federal Bureau of
Investigation (FBI), the United States Department of Justice (DOJ), or any
participant’s agency. Further, the
inclusion of these trends and strategies on the FBI web site does not represent
an endorsement of them by either the FBI or DOJ.
Group 1:
The Future of Technology and Its Effect on Law Enforcement
Trends
1.
Trend: Technology
allowing you to change your fingerprints will exist.
Year: 2005 2010 2015 2020
Likelihood (%): 26 32 45 55
Impact: 1.7 1.7
1.7 1.4
2. Trend: Classroom
training for police agencies will be provided on the Internet.
Year: 2005 2010 2015 2020
Likelihood (%): 61 79 81 84
Impact: 2.4 2.7 3.0 3.0
3.
Trend: Criminal
Justice Education with an emphasis on change will exist.
Year: 2005 2010 2015 2020
Likelihood (%): 55 67 76 84
Impact: 2.4
2.7 2.8 2.9
4.
Trend: There
will be more departments with computer crime units and even smaller departments
will employ "cyber cops" (those trained in the investigation of
computer crimes).
Year: 2005 2010 2015 2020
Likelihood (%): 55 66 68 70
Impact: 2.8 3.2 3.0 3.0
5.
Trend: Creative
training methods such as online training and computer-based training
simulations will be the norm, as they will be a way for smaller departments to
train officers on new technologies without breaking the bank.
Year: 2005 2010 2015 2020
Likelihood (%): 57 65 74 81
Impact: 2.3 2.9 3.1 3.1
6.
Trend: Thinking/reasoning
machines (robots) and digitally engineered personalities (cyber-agents
programmed with complex emotions, intelligence, reasoning, and personality
traits) will achieve and surpass human level intelligence.
Year: 2005 2010 2015 2020
Likelihood (%): 3
9 16 31
Impact: 0.6 1.0 1.6 1.9
7.
Trend: Genetic
engineering and biotechnology will allow the direct biological adaptation of
machine based components to the human brain/central nervous system (i.e.,
memory, vision, computational power, communication, networking).
Year: 2005 2010 2015 2020
Likelihood (%): 21 29 40 47
Impact: 0.7 1.3 1.7 2.3
8.
Trend: Collaborative
technologies that will positively identify individual(s) as present at the
scene of a crime as well as technologies that will enable law enforcement
agencies to detect concealed contraband hidden on suspects will be developed.
Year: 2005 2010 2015 2020
Likelihood (%): 51 56 62 69
Impact: 2.9 3.0 3.4 3.6
9. Trend: Truly effective nonlethal options
for subduing violent individuals will be in use.
Year: 2005 2010 2015 2020
Likelihood (%): 41 62 72 85
Impact: 2.4 2.7 3.0 3.0
10.
Trend: Truly
effective hand-held concealed weapons detectors will be available to identify
armed suspects.
Year: 2005 2010 2015 2020
Likelihood (%): 47 69 76 84
Impact: 2.3 2.4 2.6 2.7
11. Trend: Personally tailored, artificial
intoxicants will replace more traditional drugs. These drugs will first become popular among the well-to-do but
will eventually spread to all groups.
These new drugs will have few deleterious side effects and no addictive
potential. Drug enforcement and
restriction will become un-workable.
Year: 2005 2010 2015 2020
Likelihood (%): 27 41 47 48
Impact: 1.2 1.7 1.7 1.5
12.
Trend: Wearable
recording systems and private surveillance will combine to make most activities
in publicly accessible areas (and many in private) available to law
enforcement. Home burglaries will drop,
muggings will decline, corporate theft will be reduced. "Shadows" and anonymity will be
very difficult to find.
Year: 2005 2010 2015 2020
Likelihood (%): 46 54 63 74
Impact: 2.3 2.9 3.1 3.3
13.
Trend: Biometrics
as an identification tool will be used for many purposes to include perimeter
access, bank transactions, identification of known criminals, and ultimately,
as a database for the identification of all persons.
Year: 2005 2010 2015 2020
Likelihood (%): 46 59 70 81
Impact: 2.6 3.0 3.1 3.4
14.
Trend: Law
enforcement training methods will become more standardized for all with future
technology, allowing city/county/state/federal departments to be trained alike
on similar issues. Virtual reality
computing hardware and software will be utilized.
Year: 2005 2010 2015 2020
Likelihood (%): 25 44 54 72
Impact: 2.3 2.3 2.4 2.6
15.
Trend:
The longevity of life will increase significantly.
Year: 2005 2010 2015 2020
Likelihood (%): 18 26 34 47
Impact: 0.8 1.2 1.5 2.0
16.
Trend: There
will be continued controversy surrounding new technology
Year: 2005 2010 2015 2020
Likelihood (%): 20
30 40 35
Impact:
1.5 1.5 2.5 2.0
17.
Trend: There
will be strong scrutiny of new technologies
Year: 2005 2010 2015 2020
Likelihood (%): 30
35 45
50
Impact: 2.0 2.5 3.0
3.0
18.
Trend: Crimes
committed against high technology‑dependent systems, or activities that
utilize those systems to further criminal pursuits, will increase
dramatically.
Year: 2005 2010 2015 2020
Likelihood (%): 53 68 73 78
Impact: 2.9 3.3
3.6 4.0
19.
Trend: Wireless technology will supplant wired networks. This will be coupled with voice recognition/hands‑free devices
that will combine the functions of cellphones, radios, Palmpilots, computers,
video cameras and GPS units, and may include wearable devices that will allow
the processing and exchanging of data from any location.
Year: 2005 2010 2015 2020
Likelihood (%): 57 68 81 92
Impact: 2.5 3.3 3.9 3.9
20.
Trend: Policing
agencies will be forced to commit significantly more resources in an effort to
keep up with hacking/cracking trends.
Year: 2005 2010 2015 2020
Likelihood (%): 61 68 69 72
Impact: 2.9 3.3 3.8 3.9
21.
Trend: With
the proliferation of wireless communications, ownership and use of the airwaves
will continue to be fiercely debated. Piracy of the airwaves will emerge as a
serious crime. In some cases, as when
emergency police, medical, and other services are affected, it will be viewed
as a violent crime.
Year: 2005 2010 2015 2020
Likelihood (%): 46 56 60 65
Impact: 2.0 2.6 2.9 2.9
Strategies (No
Order)
1.
Encourage
aggressive research and development of nonlethal weapons and apprehension
technologies.
2.
Form
partnerships with academic institutions (in a variety of disciplines) to
educate and train personnel in emerging technologies which impact the policing
profession.
3.
Take a
graduated implementation strategy with regard to artificial intelligence, forensic
identification, and technology while maintaining respect for an individual's
civil rights.
4.
Extensive
education and information dissemination is essential to mitigate societal
“backlash” in response to new technologies.
5.
Due to the lack
of knowledge and resources to combat cybercrime, police must seek more funding
for education and training to combat these crimes.
6.
Law enforcement
agencies need to have proactive planning programs to monitor trends, discuss
and develop new strategies, and facilitate and respond to emerging trends.
7.
Due to the lack
of knowledge and resources to combat cybercrime, law enforcement must form a
variety of partnerships with both public and private entities.
8.
Law enforcement
agencies and personnel should be encouraged to further experiment with new
artificial intelligence and biometric technologies and should adopt these
technologies when they become viable.
9.
A
proliferation of new benign, mind-altering activities/substances will require
the redistribution of certain resources in law enforcement.
Group 2:
The Future of Leadership and Management in Policing Agencies
Trends
1.
Trend: The
dominant presence in the workforce of Generation X-ers will require police
supervisors, managers, and executives to possess high levels of competence in
interpersonal relations, coaching/counseling and mentoring. In addition, police leaders will need to
develop the ability to engender “follower-ship” in subordinates. Supervisors
increasingly will be Generation X-ers who will bring a new level of creativity
to the workplace.
Year: 2005 2010 2015 2020
Likelihood (%): 51 61 74 88
Impact:
2.4 2.8 3.6
4.0
2.
Trend: Public
safety coordination will increasingly require new forms of problem solving,
work groups, and organizational structures..
Year: 2005 2010 2015 2020
Likelihood (%): 48
60 76 85
Impact: 2.8 3.4 4.0 3.6
3.
Trend: Future
success may require modified agency structures and working relations.
Year: 2005 2010 2015 2020
Likelihood (%): 30
40 60 72
Impact: 1.6 2.2 3.0 3.2
4.
Trend: Peace
Officer minimum educational requirements will increase.
Year: 2005 2010 2015 2020
Likelihood (%): 41
62 81 93
Impact: 1.8 3.0 3.8 4.0
5.
Trend: The
importance of civilians in police forces is increasing as more unsworn staff
are needed to address evolving business, technical, analytic, legal, training,
and funding aspects of law enforcement.
Looking toward the future, there may also be rising support for
privatization and outsourcing of certain non-law enforcement and administrative
functions while law enforcement handles traditional duties and
responsibilities.
Year: 2005 2010 2015 2020
Likelihood (%): 42
55 72 85
Impact: 2 2.6 3.8 4.0
6.
Trend: Comprehensive
strategic plans that will provide for agencies to deliver policing services in
a very different way with identifiable performance measures and clearly stated
vision, mission, and values statements will be implemented.
Year: 2005 2010 2015 2020
Likelihood (%): 37
55 73 89
Impact: 2.2 3.2 3.8 4.0
7.
Group 2 members
also identified the following trends but did not vote on them. As such, only the trends themselves will be
listed:
-- High tech crime threats will increase
exponentially (e.g., Internet crimes,
computer intrusions, crimes
against children, infrastructure
threats) requiring new management techniques and technical recruitment
strategies.
-- Crime will increasingly shift to the
suburbs requiring new managerial planning practices to ensure investigative
resources are allocated appropriately within the suburban offices.
-- Demographic shifts in the population in
terms of both immigration and domestic migration will require new managerial
recruitment strategies to ensure a diversified workforce.
Strategies
(In Descending Order of Importance)
1.
Strategic
planning issues: Law enforcement must
adopt integrated, collaborative, multi-disciplinary planning to ensure that
organizations are able to meet the challenges of the future and correlate
budgets to strategic planning priorities and results. Law enforcement must establish best practices to more effectively
project the future.
2.
Leadership
Issues: There is a need for more role models/ mentoring within the law
enforcement community. Potential
leaders must be identified early on and then given special training and
rotational/shadowing opportunities to ensure career development and to maintain
a high level of professionalism within the law enforcement community.
3.
Change
Management: Organizational leadership
changes due to the flattening of management hierarchy will radically change the
culture in police organizations. There
is a need to ensure that sufficient attention is given to organizational and
cultural change management to ensure that the proper values and work
environment are present to foster continued institutional viability and
innovation.
4.
Recruitment,
Retention, & Training Issues: Departmental guidelines regarding tenure and
promotion may require some examination so that organizations have the
flexibility to promote and retain personnel appropriately, especially among the
high tech work force as Internet/computer intrusion/ child pornography/
infrastructure threats increase.
5.
Changing
Supervisory Attribute Requirements:
Flattening of the organizational hierarchy will be necessary to devolve
power and foster team oriented problem solving approaches. As we go about
flattening the hierarchy, however, we must come up with some other sort of
modification to the pay structure to compensate for this compression of
management and to ensure retention of the best and brightest personnel.
6.
Changing
Supervisory Attribute Requirements: The rigid paramilitary style should be
replaced by work teams consisting of line level officers, community members,
and corporate members, all partnering together to accomplish public safety.
7.
Changing
Supervisory Attribute Requirements: The
current squad structure must be modified to give way to more productive and
creative teams of officers who, having been empowered with more autonomy, will
become efficient problem solvers, thus strengthening the ties between the
police and the citizenry.
8.
Changing
Supervisory Attribute Requirements: The
current generation needs some new skills and attributes from supervisors to
allow efficient management in terms of employee development. In particular, supervisors will need to
allow for creativity and innovation for success.
9.
Changing
Supervisory Attribute Requirements: Law
enforcement agencies should begin to experiment with “networked” leadership of
matrix management rather than the traditional forms of hierarchical management
10.
Peace Officer
Educational Requirements: Law
enforcement agencies must study the impact of increased educational
requirements on recruitment and retention of qualified police officer
candidates and develop response strategies.
11.
Changing
Supervisory Attribute Requirements:
Community policing and problem solving should increase, thereby
strengthening ties between the police, citizenry, and corporate partners.
12. Enhance
image of law enforcement/ raise public consciousness/ trust: Law enforcement
offices will increasingly need a media/
public relations representative to provide not only press releases but foster
an increased public awareness of the positive role law enforcement is having on
the community.
13. Privatization
Issues: If the public sector encounters difficulties in keeping up with demand
in certain areas, specialized areas of the police responsibilities may be
privatized; however these should most likely be administrative or support
functional areas as opposed to primary policing responsibilities. (e.g.,
outsourcing of functions like administering polygraph examinations, loading
data, etc.). To ensure proper strategic
planning, law enforcement should explore legislative means to determine whether
privatization is permitted, prohibited, or legislation can be enacted to permit
privatization of certain functions. Where
privatization occurs, there should be very clear selection and training
standards to ensure that integrity and ethics are not compromised.
14.
Changing
Demographics: To keep pace with
changing demographic trends in terms of immigration and domestic migration, law
enforcement must develop recruitment plans to ensure a diversified workforce.
15. Bolster
Citizen Involvement: Public awareness and trust should be enhanced through
establishment of citizens’ police academies and citizen police panels.
16.
Peace Officer
Educational Requirements: We must move toward professionalization of the law
enforcement profession, which mandates continued learning throughout the
careers of personnel.
17.
Shifting Crime
Patterns: As crime increasingly moves to the suburbs, law enforcement must
strategically plan its resource requirements to ensure that smaller offices
will be equipped to meet future challenges.
18. Bolster
Citizen Involvement: In order to provide a realistic view of policing to the
public, employees should be encouraged to submit articles detailing police
accomplishments to mainstream magazines
and journals, as appropriate.
Group 2 members also identified an additional
strategy but to date have not had an opportunity to vote on it:
Arbitration Mechanisms: Leaders should
develop and implement measures to deal with and overcome resistance to change.
Group 3: Future Crime/Future Law
Trends
1.
Trend: Cybercrimes will dramatically
increase the need for responsive laws and enforcement operations.
Year: 2005 2010 2015 2020
Likelihood (%): 78 84 89 91
Impact: 2.8 3.0 3.5 3.5
2.
Trend: Policing
will have to deal with increasing incidents of civil unrest due to
fractionalization and spontaneous, unchecked, violent outbursts.
Year: 2005 2010 2015 2020
Likelihood (%): 50 58 60 66
Impact: 3.0 3.0 3.3 3.3
3. Trend: A weapon of mass destruction (either
traditional explosives, nuclear, biological or chemical) will be employed
domestically causing more than 250 fatalities.
Year: 2005 2010 2015 2020
Likelihood (%): 60 69 76 85
Impact: 3.0 3.3 3.5 3.5
4.
Trend: Perceived
law enforcement abuses (e.g. in areas of use of force, racial profiling, drug
enforcement, investigative techniques) will result in statutory restrictions on
or the elimination of police practices such as stop and frisk, vehicle stops
involving less than probable cause, and the use of confidential informants.
Year: 2005 2010 2015 2020
Likelihood (%): 39 46 50 53
Impact: 2.5 2.8 3.0 3.0
5.
Trend: Enhanced
home/group home/ isolation room electronic monitoring will reduce demand for
prisons even for serious offenders.
Traditional incarceration, as a means of corrections, will become
greatly modified, but will not totally disappear.
Year: 2005 2010 2015 2020
Likelihood (%): 28 35 40 46
Impact: 1.5 1.5 1.3 1.3
6.
Trend: There
will be an increase in religious and ethnic based terrorism.
Year: 2005 2010 2015 2020
Likelihood (%): 26 30 34 41
Impact: 1.8 1.8 2.3 2.3
7.
Trend: Disinformation
campaigns related to new technologies will appear in many venues (especially
the Internet) and will undermine confidence in
those technologies.
Year: 2005 2010 2015 2020
Likelihood (%): 38 44 49 54
Impact: 1.8 1.8 1.8 2.0
8.
Trend: The
evolution of a new drug culture, based on the development of non-addictive,
increasingly potent, non-traceable, longer lasting, and more easily produced
substances, will challenge society and law enforcement.
Year: 2005 2010 2015 2020
Likelihood (%): 43 50 63 73
Impact: 2.0 2.5 2.8 3.0
9.
Trend: Acts
of genomic/genetic terrorism will lead to greater pressure for law enforcement
to become involved in protecting the food supply and investigating assaults on
food production and quality. (Environmental policing)
Year: 2005 2010 2015 2020
Likelihood (%): 25 31 36 51
Impact: 2.0 2.0 2.8 3.0
10.
Trend: As
cyber technology advances and tracking the movement of stores of value (goods
or commodities) becomes easier, there will be more thefts of non or low
traceable stores of value.
Year: 2005 2010 2015 2020
Likelihood (%): 27 33 38 42
Impact: 1.5 1.8 2.3 2.3
11.
Trend: Advances
in animal farming combined with pressure from animal rights and other
opposition groups will lead to the promulgation of numerous animal protection
laws as well as greater demands for law enforcement.
Year: 2005 2010 2015 2020
Likelihood (%): 14 21 35 46
Impact: 1.3 2.0 2.5 2.8
12.
Trend: Alien
smuggling and forced servitude will increasingly occur.
Year: 2005 2010 2015 2020
Likelihood (%): 49 55 53 55
Impact: 2.3 2.3 2.5 2.5
13.
Trend: The
declining aggregate crime rate witnessed during the past decade will “bottom
out” during the next five years and increases in the crime rate will occur.
Year: 2005 2010 2015 2020
Likelihood (%): 55 61 67 75
Impact: 1.8 1.8 1.8 1.8
14.
Trend: “Outrageous
crimes,” such as the Columbine High School massacre, or copycat crimes of this
nature, will likely continue.
Year: 2005 2010 2015 2020
Likelihood (%): 51 56 55 46
Impact: 2.8 2.5 2.0 2.0
15. Trend: Courts will continue to invalidate
laws on the basis that legislatures exceeded their authority.
Year: 2005 2010 2015 2020
Likelihood (%): 60 61 63 64
Impact: 1.8 2.0 2.0 2.3
Strategies
(In Descending Order of Importance)
1. Develop tools and expertise in the
investigation of cybercrimes.
2.
Develop
practices and policies that address terrorism without violating constitutional
rights and guarantees.
3.
Promote
forecasting and proactive planning to address change.
4.
Review criminal
justice practices universally for ethical considerations.
5.
Expand
international and domestic information sharing efforts as well as
multi-jurisdictional cooperation and communication.
6.
Develop
alternatives to current practices of recruiting and hiring information
technology personnel in police agencies.
7.
Engage in more
cooperative ventures in identifying criminal trends and developing law
enforcement strategies.
8.
Integrate
services and information sharing throughout the criminal justice system to
ensure continuity (e.g. offender tracking, victim tracking).
9.
Increase law
enforcement training in civil unrest and peacekeeping practices.
10.
Establish,
maintain, and enhance police relationships between officers and
students, teachers, and administrators in
public and private schools.
11.
Pursue wider
implementation of prototype restorative justice programs backed by sound
research protocols.
12.
Establish
effective protocol for rapid identification of substances that have a psycho-
tropic effect.
Group 4: The Future of Policing Practices and
Philosophies
Trends
1.
Trend: Police
psychologists will be licensed by the states to insure the highest standard of
excellence; all departments will use police psychologists for pre-employment
screening.
Year: 2005 2010 2015 2020
Likelihood (%): 24 28 32 34
Impact: 1.7 2.0 1.8 2.2
2.
Trend: Police
will have highly trained background investigators to ensure that police
applicants' backgrounds represent core values of pride, honesty, preservation
of life, pursuit of excellence, compassion, loyalty, professionalism,
trustworthiness and courage in addition to current requirements.